Comparison of Computer Testing versus Traditional Paper and Pencil Testing

s International, 48 (7), 2137.Llabre, M. M., Clements, N. E., Fitzhugh, K. B., Lancelotta, G., Mazzagatti, R. D., &Quinones, N. (1987). The effect of computer-administered testing on test anxiety andperformance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 429-433.Lord, F. M. (1977). Some item analysis and test theory for a system of computer-assisted testconstruction for individualized instruction. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1 (3), 447-55.Luecht, R. M., & Nungester, R. J. (1998). Some practical examples of computer-adaptivesequential testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35 (3), 229-249.Lynch, E. J. (1997). Equivalence of computer versus paper and pencil academic testing in anintroductory psychology course (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1997).Dissertation Abstracts International, 58 (3), 833.Marcus, A. D. (1999, August 27). Exam Time: SAT stress isn’t just for students; The ETS isunder pressure, too; Educational Testing Service faces tough new world filled with competition;Leaned on by College Board. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Shiah, R. L. (1997). Can computers teach problem-solvingstrategies to students with mild mental retardation? A case study. Remedial and Special Education,18 (3), 157-165.Mayer, D. P. (1998). Do new teaching standards undermine performance on old tests?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 20 (2), 53-73.Mazzeo, J. (1991). Comparability of computer and paper and pencil scores for two CLEPgeneral examinations. College Board Report No. 91-5. [On-line.] Abstract from: Computer file:ERIC-Current: ED344902